Article Directory :: Arts & Entertainment Articles

Is Digital Photography Better Than Film?

By Andrew Goodall

Republish: EasyPublish™ Published: 29Mar2008 Word count: 804 Viewed: 547 time(s) Get Free Content For Your Site

Digital cameras have changed the world of photography forever. It has never been easier - or cheaper - to practice and learn the art of photography, and millions of people are taking an interest in photography for the first time. But the question is still often asked. Which is better: film or digital?

I use film, but if someone asks me whether they should buy a film camera or a digital camera, I almost always recommend digital. The answer is not so simple if someone asks me which is 'better' - film or digital?

The answer comes down what you mean by 'better.' Photography is many things to many people, so the merits of the medium depends on what you expect to get out of it.

In my business (a nature photography gallery), the single most important criteria is the quality of the printed photograph. For me, film still provides superior quality enlargements, even though darkroom printing has all but died out. These days, I get a high-resolution scan from the original film, and print my photos digitally. This process gives me a better quality enlargement than a print from a digital camera. I am talking about BIG enlargements here - A2 and sometimes larger.

So why do I recommend others to switch to digital photography (if they haven't already)? Simply because not many people make their living selling framed photographs. Let's face it, how many of us will ever print a photo larger than 8x12 inch (20x30cm)?

In fact, how many digital photos these days are ever printed at all? The day of the photo album has passed. Today most photos will only ever exist as digital files. We can share them in emails, insert them into websites, use them as screensavers...for many people the idea of actually printing a photo is little more than a novelty.

So in the age of digital photography, what does film has to offer? Well, not much, except for the high cost of developing and printing (don't forget you have to pay for each exposure, even the bad ones). Then there is the long delay between taking the photo and seeing the result. Finally, if you want to use your photo for any practical purpose, you will probably have to scan it to turn it into a digital file anyway.

So, is digital photography 'better' than film photography? In the modern world, which demands speed and convenience, yes. With your digital camera you can take all the photos you like at no real cost, and see the results instantly. You don't have to pay to print photos you don't want, and you can simply delete your unsuccessful images from your camera.

That's not to say digital photography is perfect; far from it. I have already mentioned that your digital files are not as good as film for very big enlargements, but there is more to it than that. The quality of a digital print is a little 'flatter' than a photo printed from film. It may have plenty of colour and detail, but in ways that are hard to explain, it lacks the illusion of three-dimensional real life that you can get from film.

In the past, most digital photographers would laugh at me for suggesting such a thing. I suspect that was because after investing a small fortune in their new technological treasure, they were reluctant to admit that their new toy was not perfect in every way. Today, however, even the most committed digital convert seems willing to admit that the digital revolution has, for all its advantages, brought with it a level of compromise in quality.

Is there a solution? Of course there is, and it is called software. Whichever image editing software you use, you can easily 'tweak' your photos, to the point where the quality is as rich and three-dimensional as a film photograph. These programs have become a fact of life for many photographers, but not everyone likes to use them or even knows how to. Then there are the grumpy old purists (like me) who feel that a well-exposed photo should not require enhancement to bring it up to standard.

So where does all this leave us? Is digital better than film? For my purposes, no. For your purposes, most likely yes. If your priority is not large, high quality prints, there is really very little reason to stick with film (other than nostalgia).

If you are shopping for a camera (SLR or compact), make it a digital. Just as important, take the time to learn how to use it. Photography is still about focus, aperture, shutter speed, composition and lighting. The digital vs. film debate means nothing if you simply switch your camera to automatic and take snapshots. Oh, and get to know your computer...you're going to need it.

EasyPublish™ this article - publishers click here

More articles by Andrew Goodall

Free Report!
Ten Essential Secrets Of Article Marketing ... Grab Your Free
Copy Now:

Need Content?
Regular Top Quality Content for your Blog, Ezine or Website ...
Delivered Direct,
For Free!
Click For Details