Article Directory :: Legal Articles

Ride with a drunk driver and you may be legally responsible for your own injuries or death

By Christopher Davis

Subscribe to Christopher Davis's RSS feed using any feed reader!

Republish: EasyPublish
Published: 31Oct2007
Word count: 679
Viewed: 544 time(s)
Bookmark this article using any bookmark manager!
Get Free Content For Your Site

With the holidays approaching soon, I expect that there will be many more opportunities for people to drive after consuming alcohol. Of course, most people know that a drunk driver who causes injury or death can be sued for this unlawful conduct. But, did you know that a passenger who knowingly rides with an intoxicated person can be held responsible for the passenger's own injuries or death arising from a drunk driving accident?

Yes, it's true. A case decided last October by the Washington Court of Appeals affirmed a jury's decision to hold a passenger 35% responsible for her own injuries after accepting a ride from a driver she knew to have consumed alcohol earlier in the evening.

In the case of Hickly v. Bare, 135 Wn. App. 676 (October 2006), the driver admitted to consuming at least 6 beers earlier that evening. The passenger (Hickly) admitted to consuming 3 drinks before the accident but testified at trial that she was not intoxicated when she got into the vehicle. Another passenger (the drunk driver's brother) testified that the driver appeared too intoxicated to drive, but he decided to get into the vehicle anyway. All 3 occupants had been at a tavern earlier in the evening where they consumed alcohol. The testimony established that all three were at the tavern for more than four (4) hours.

Shortly before they left the bar, Hickly spoke with the driver about whether he was able to drive. According to Hickly, the driver appeared fine to drive. She testified that he "walked fine, was able to handle his keys and functions of the vehicle, and did not slur his speech." The driver's brother however, disagreed with Hickly's observations of the driver. He testified that his brother was too drunk to drive. Shortly after Hickly got into the car, the driver lost control of the vehicle and nearly hit a telephone pole. He went off the roadway where the car flipped at least 3 or 4 times. A passerby who stopped to render aid testified that the driver appeared intoxicated. Hickly filed suit against the driver and alleged that she suffered permanent neck and back injuries due to the accident.

The driver admitted that he was intoxicated and that he caused the accident. But he also claimed that Hickly had also negligently caused or contributed to her own injuries by agreeing to ride with a driver that was intoxicated. Thus, the only issue before the jury was apportionment of fault and damages.

At trial the jury was instructed by the judge that Hickly could be held negligent for causing her own injuries if they found that she rode in a vehicle operated by a person known to be intoxicated. Apparently the jury agreed with the drunk driver's attorney by holding Hickly 35% responsible for her injuries when she accepted a ride from a person she knew, or should have known was intoxicated. Hickly's damages were then reduced by 35% to account for her own negligence.

The appeals court also said that if the jury had found that Hickly was intoxicated when she was injured, then her intoxication might have operated as a COMPLETE DEFENSE precluding recovery of damages altogether. But only if the drunk driver had established that (1) Hickly's intoxication proximately caused her own injuries; and (2) Hickly was more than 50 percent comparatively at fault in causing her injuries. Hickly was fortunate in this case because the jury did not believe that she was intoxicated even though she had consumed alcohol earlier in the evening.

The lesson from this case should be clear. Even if you don't consume alcohol, if you knowlingly get into a vehicle with a person whom you knew, or should have known, was intoxicated you could be held responsible for causing your own injuries if there is an accident. You can bet the insurance company will defend such a case vigorously by arguing this new case. Don't ever knowingly accept a ride from someone who has consumed alcohol.

Christopher M. Davis is the managing partner of Davis Law Group. He brings over 15 years of practical yet innovative experience to personal injury cases. He practices law in Seattle, WA. You can learn more about Mr. Davis at http://www.InjuryTrialLawyer.com or http://www.seattleaccidentnews.com. Copyright 2007 Christopher M. Davis.

Bookmark this article using any bookmark manager! Subscribe to Christopher Davis's RSS feed using any feed reader!

EasyPublish™ this article - publishers click here

More articles by Christopher Davis

Free Report!
Ten Essential Secrets Of Article Marketing ... Grab Your Free
Copy
Now:




We respect your privacy.


Need Content?
Regular Top Quality Content for your Blog, Ezine or Website ...
Delivered Direct,
For Free!

Click For Details



Arts & Entertainment
Automotive
Business - General
Computers & Technology
Finance & Investment
Food & Drink
Health & Fitness
Home & Family
Internet Marketing/Online Business
Legal
Pets & Animals
Politics & Government
Reference & Education
Religion & Faith
Self-Improvement/Motivation
Social
Sports & Recreation
Travel & Leisure
Writing & Speaking

More legal articles:

  • Colleges That Offer Criminal Justice (Jason Drohn)
    Before choosing on an educational program to engage it is beneficial to consider the career direction that you would like to be on after finishing school. One field in which there is a consistent and progressing necessity for qualified professionals is criminal justice. The choices and favorable opts are widen and be present in around all regions of the country.

  • Colleges With Criminal Justice Majors (Jason Drohn)
    Colleges with criminal justice majors do different tasks in the community. They can be very active, the one holding a gun and running after the criminals or the one in administrative section who do the paper works like society's rules.

  • Lien Priority (Mark Shapiro)
    On the topic of judgment recovery, if your debtor will or has owned real property; recording a lien, and the priority of liens may be important. A plan is that if there is enough equity in your debtor's real estate, you are paid when their real estate gets sold or refinanced. Most of the time, but not always, the first to record their lien prevails.

  • Negligent Bone Fracture Repair (Julie Glynn)
    If there is a delay, the bone will either fail to knit back together, or will fuse in the wrong position, thereby protracting a patient's symptoms.

  • The Importance Of A Petty Theft Defense Attorney (Jeff Schuman)
    If you have been charged with petty theft you might be very worried about the type of consequences you may be facing. One of the best ways that you can do for your case is contact an attorney early and this can help you to move through your court case faster.

  • Lawyers And Judgments (Mark Shapiro)
    When you decide to suddenly "fire" a contingency attorney, you may have to pay them a bunch of money due to Quantum Merit (sometimes named Meruit) clauses in contracts. Quantum Merit clauses are inside their retainer contracts of most contingency recovery attorneys, where they are paid for whatever work they performed, when you quickly fire them.

  • Canada: A Prime Site to Arbitrate International Commercial Disputes (Robert Neron)
    When looking for a location for arbitration for international commercial disputes, one of the major criteria should be a location that conveys a feeling of impartiality amongst all the parties involved. This should facilitate the agreement to engage in the process by mitigating this roadblock.

We Automatically Distribute Articles
To Thousands Of Publishers And Web Sites:

Submit Article
All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and we do not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information. The views expressed are those of the individual contributing authors and not necessarily those of this web site, or its owner, Takanomi Limited.
 
Copyright © 2012 Takanomi Ltd. Company no. 5629683. All rights reserved. | Privacy | Legal | Contact Information