Article Directory :: Sports & Recreation Articles

Washington Women Discover That It Is Easier to Win a National Championship Than to Defend It

By Ed Bagley

Subscribe to Ed Bagley's RSS feed using any feed reader!

Republish: EasyPublish
Published: 21Feb2010
Word count: 1004
Viewed: 264 time(s)
Bookmark this article using any bookmark manager!
Get Free Content For Your Site

Copyright © 2010 Ed Bagley

There is a new sign on I-5 running north to south through Western Washington and by the Montlake Campus at University of Washington, and it tells a truth that many national champions have had to come to terms with—that it is easier to win a national title than to defend it.

The continuing dominance of the Huskies' women cross-country team came to a screeching halt at the 2009 NCAA National Championship Meet. Some runners from Villanova and Florida State found their way across the finish line ahead of them as Washington, the defending national champions, found themselves in 3rd place with a score of 188.

Last year they won the title with 79 points. Villanova won this year's title with 86 points, followed by Florida State with 133, Texas Tech was 4th with 191, and Princeton 5th with 251.

Having analyzed the data from the last year's and this year's meet, it is pretty easy to understand—even with Washington's apparent continuing dominance—how the Huskies could come up a dollar short and a day late at this year's national meet.

In its simplest form, Villanova's runners finished 6-12-20-22-26. Washington finished 2-21-27-29-109. Last year's national championship team finished 5-9-19-20-26. If there is a glaring number in these 3 sets of figures, it is 109—Washington's 5th scoring runner this year.

Just how important is the 5th scoring runner on a team? It can be the difference between winning a national championship and losing a national championship.

The Huskies' 5th scorer this year was Allison Linnell, a freshman who does not have the same talent, experience and maturity as a runner as does her teammates Christine Babcock and Kendra Schaaf, who last year finished 5th and 9th in the national meet as freshmen. Linnell did not run in the West Regional Meet, and her effort in the national meet was her first at the highest level of competition.

Last year Washington's women ran 5-9-19-20-26 with a spread between their first and last scorer of 35 seconds. Their 6th runner was 32nd (sophomore Lauren Saylor) and their 7th runner was 41st (senior Anita Campbell). The spread between Washington's 1st and 7th runners last year was only 49 seconds, which is rarer than winter sunshine in a rainy state.

Last year's team was living the dream. Two newly recruited freshmen, Christine Babcock and Kendra Schaaf, became superstars overnight because of their talent, desire and maturity. This was an anomaly of gigantic proportions.

The absence of graduating seniors Amanda Miller, who finished 26th last year in 20:37, and Anita Campbell, who finished 41st in 20:51 (the 7th runner and out of the scoring), was huge. Without their influence in helping to give stability to the team and being role models for the younger runners, Washington would not have gotten the job done last year.

Remember, Amanda Miller was 26th last year and the Huskies' last scoring runner; Allison Linnell was 109th this year and the Huskies' last scoring runner.

Another huge factor was Lauren Saylor, who finished 32nd in the national meet last year in 20:44. Saylor was the 6th Husky to finish last year and did not figure in the scoring, but she did not even run in the West Regional and the National Championship meets this year. Any way you cut it, Saylor's 20:44 last year was much faster than Linnell's 21:35 time this year. The question is: What happened to Saylor? I am not close enough to the program to know. Her absence could have made a huge difference in the Husky team confidence level.

All 4 of Washington's first scorers this year ran faster than they did in the West Regional Meet that the Huskies won, but Babcock ran 41 seconds slower this year (finishing 29th rather than 5th), and Lawrence ran 6 seconds slower (finishing 27th rather than 19th). The 6,000-meter distance (3.72 miles) was the same.

Washington's best this year was Kendra Schaaf, who was the individual runner-up with a time of 19:52, only 5 seconds slower than national champion Angela Bizzarri of Illinois (19:47). Schaaf was 9th last year in 20:18. Illinois was 12th in the team standings. Oregon was 9th, led by freshman Jordan Hasay, who finished 16th in 20:24.

Husky junior Kailey Campbell, who did not compete in last year's nationals, finished 148th (7th among her teammates) at 21:54. In the West Regional Meet, Campbell was 4th in 21:00. It was not her day.

To put it all into perspective, even if Allison Linnell or Kailey Campbell had finished right behind Christine Babcock, who was 29th in 20:43, Washington still would have been way short of Villanova in its title run.

Washington coach Greg Metcalf had to have known that, despite the Huskies' runaway success until the national meet, he had a problem finding a 5th scoring runner who could duplicate the success of Babcock and Schaaf as freshmen.

As talented and young as the Washington team is, they did not get as good performances from 3 of their 4 top finishers this year as they did last year, and they lacked the depth in the 5th scoring position to repeat as national champions.

Michigan State was 26th in team competition, led by Emily MacLeod's 42nd place finish in 20:57. MacLeod won the Great Lakes Regional Meet, but the Spartans had no one to run with MacLeod, and could do no better.

In the men's run, Oklahoma State finished 7-8-11-24-77 to win the 2009 national championship with 127 points. Oregon, with sophomore Luke Puskedra's 17th-place finish in 30:02, was second at 143. Alabama was 3rd with 173.

David McNeill won the individual title in 29:07, and teammate Jordan Chipangama was 3rd, to lead Northern Arizona to a 4th place team finish. William & Mary was 5th (226), Colorado 6th (315), Wisconsin 7th (321), New Mexico and Iona tied for 8th (350), and Stanford 10th (354). Stanford's Chris Derrick was the individual runner-up in 29:15. The men's course was 10,000 meters (6.2 miles).

Washington's men were 18th, led by senior Kelly Spady's 55th-place finish in 30:36. The Michigan State men were 31st and dead last, led by Isaiah VanDoorne's 108th-place finish in 31:17. The Spartans had a terrible day.

Current USA High School Boys Track and Field Records Through 2009 - Parts 1 and 2 Current USA High School Girls Track and Field Records Through 2009 - Parts 1 and 2 http://www.edbagleyblog.com/X-Country,Track&FieldandDistanceRunning.html

Bookmark this article using any bookmark manager! Subscribe to Ed Bagley's RSS feed using any feed reader!

EasyPublish™ this article - publishers click here

More articles by Ed Bagley

Free Report!
Ten Essential Secrets Of Article Marketing ... Grab Your Free
Copy
Now:




We respect your privacy.


Need Content?
Regular Top Quality Content for your Blog, Ezine or Website ...
Delivered Direct,
For Free!

Click For Details



Arts & Entertainment
Automotive
Business - General
Computers & Technology
Finance & Investment
Food & Drink
Health & Fitness
Home & Family
Internet Marketing/Online Business
Legal
Pets & Animals
Politics & Government
Reference & Education
Religion & Faith
Self-Improvement/Motivation
Social
Sports & Recreation
Travel & Leisure
Writing & Speaking

More sports articles:

  • What Is Golf Failure, What Is Golf Success? (Paul D'Arcy)
    We all fail once in a while; we don't all succeed at everything we do and we don't always win every golf match, hit brilliant shots every round or sink every 40 foot putt! So don't be disappointed when you don't; learn to put your minor failures into perspective. Read this article to learn how to persue your golfing goals, and if you don't quite make it, it's not the end of the world; but if you succeed, celebrate!

  • If You Want To Play Better Golf Feedback Is The Key (Paul D'Arcy)
    Just like at work, you need feedback in all aspects of your life to know how you are performing. And golf is no different; we all need feedback to guid us to our goals. Learn how to arrange your golf goals to maximise your improvements, and get your golfing buddys to help you get there. And don't forget to celebrate your golfing achievements!

  • Golf Improvement Breakthroughs Come One Shot At A Time (Paul D'Arcy)
    Improvement in any aspect of life doesn't usually come in big gains; it usually occurs in small increments and gradually. This is the same in golf. In reality, improvement comes one shot at a time. Read on to learn how to approach improvement, as to not lose patience in your game and set your Personal Scoring Window which will allow you to reach your improvments in a tangible and real way.

  • Turning Golf Frustration Into Golf Elation (Paul D'Arcy)
    Do you get frustrated after a poor golf shot? Learn how to turn that frustration into a positive reaction. Tour players can be upset after they've hit a shot, we all can, but the difference is, they know to accept the outcome and move on. Knowing this, you can quickly recover and become a better player.

  • Always Play Golf For A Reason (Paul D'Arcy)
    Learn how to raise your concentration levels during your golf games. Professional Golfers have outstanding levels of concentration; read on to discover 5 simple tips and practice routines to help you improve your concentration throughout your golf.

We Automatically Distribute Articles
To Thousands Of Publishers And Web Sites:

Submit Article
All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and we do not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information. The views expressed are those of the individual contributing authors and not necessarily those of this web site, or its owner, Takanomi Limited.
 
Copyright © 2012 Takanomi Ltd. Company no. 5629683. All rights reserved. | Privacy | Legal | Contact Information