Article Directory :: Legal Articles

Federal Sentencing Guidelines

By Joe Devine

Subscribe to Joe Devine's RSS feed using any feed reader!

Republish: EasyPublish
Published: 24Dec2007
Word count: 432
Viewed: 314 time(s)
Bookmark this article using any bookmark manager!
Get Free Content For Your Site

The United States has an entire organization that sets the standard sentence times for various crimes that take place in the United States. Basically, these are pre-set prison or probation terms for certain crimes. They do not allow a judge to sentence a newly convicted individual for less than say 3 years in jail for Crime X. These laws have drawn a lot of criticism because there seems to be a bias towards crimes that occur less among the upper echelon of individuals. For example, being caught with crack cocaine is subject to a longer prison term than people caught with plain cocaine. As crack cocaine is more commonly found in less affluent areas, it is seen as a biased system.

Recently, the Supreme Court upheld, in two separate cases, two much more lenient sentences that brought the punishment imposed for crack cocaine much closer to the punishments given for the powdered form of cocaine and the punishment for selling drugs in general. The court felt that federal sentencing guidelines were too harsh. This decision is being seen as the Supreme Court giving the go-ahead to judges that want to impose more lenient terms on crack offenders. The decision by the Supreme Court came on the eve of the U.S. Sentencing Commission. This group sets the guidelines for various crimes.

In the first case, the Court upheld a sentence of probation, not prison time, for an Arizona man that admitted to selling Ecstasy while he was in college. The Court felt prison was unnecessary as the man is no longer in college. The federal guidelines called for a 3 year prison sentence for the crime.

In the second case, the Court upheld a sentence of 15 years in prison for a man caught with having a gun and crack cocaine in his car. While this may seem like a long sentence, the federal guidelines call for between 19 and 22 years in a penitentiary.

The Federal Sentencing Guidelines, or the old ones at least, imposed a sentence 100 times harsher for being caught with crack cocaine than those caught with the same amount of powdered cocaine. The 100-to-1 ratio is seen as being racially biased because white people are generally caught with powdered cocaine and not white people are generally caught with crack cocaine.

The Bush Administration and its prosecutors favored longer prison sentences but respected the Court's decision. This decision gives permission for judges everywhere to issue a sentence that is less than the federal guideline. It makes the guidelines actual guidelines, not set in stone rules.

Bookmark this article using any bookmark manager! Subscribe to Joe Devine's RSS feed using any feed reader!

EasyPublish™ this article - publishers click here

More articles by Joe Devine

Free Report!
Ten Essential Secrets Of Article Marketing ... Grab Your Free
Copy
Now:




We respect your privacy.


Need Content?
Regular Top Quality Content for your Blog, Ezine or Website ...
Delivered Direct,
For Free!

Click For Details



Arts & Entertainment
Automotive
Business - General
Computers & Technology
Finance & Investment
Food & Drink
Health & Fitness
Home & Family
Internet Marketing/Online Business
Legal
Pets & Animals
Politics & Government
Reference & Education
Religion & Faith
Self-Improvement/Motivation
Social
Sports & Recreation
Travel & Leisure
Writing & Speaking

More legal articles:

  • What Is Residential Conveyancing? (Paul Howe)
    How Is Residential Conveyancing Different To Commercial Conveyancing?

  • Arkansas Judgment Related Laws (Mark Shapiro)
    This article points out a few judgment-related rules and laws in Arkansas. Arkansas laws are usually listed as being annotated in an official register, abbreviated as ANN. Laws can change over time, so please confirm all laws described in this or any of my articles. When you need to find a judgment recovery attorney in Arkansas, contact a judgment referral expert, or visit the Arkansas Bar website at: www.Arkansasbar.org

  • The Responsibilities Of A Personal Injury Lawyer (Reil Miller)
    A lot of people are already aware that there are circumstances and incidents that can lead to injuries. There are victims of accidents and other unfortunate events who have suffered both minor and serious injuries and have sustained property damages as well. However, some of these victims have no idea that they have certain rights and some are unaware that they can hold the other individual or entity responsible.

  • Continuing Legal Education Increases a Lawyer's Preparedness (Mark Etinger)
    Continuing legal education helps new lawyers prepare themselves.

  • Explain Bail Bonds: How It Works (Reil Miller)
    There are times when a person is arrested for certain criminal charges. Some people are arrested due to relatively minor offenses. However, there are still people who are arrested due to a more serious criminal offense. If a person is arrested for serious crimes, except murder or other violent offenses, he or she will have the right to post bail and be temporarily released from jail.

  • Alaska Judgment Related Laws (Mark Shapiro)
    This article points out a few judgment-related rules and laws in Alaska. Laws, regulations, and local court rules do change, so please confirm all laws described in this or all of my articles. When you need to find a judgment attorney in Alaska, contact a judgment referral expert, or visit the Alaska Bar website at: www.alaskabar.org

  • What Can A Bail Bond Agent Do? (Reil Miller)
    Suspects of minor crimes are usually released after a citation is read to them. The citation includes the date of their court hearing. However, suspects of serious crimes usually land in jail where they are booked. These suspects are then subject to bail after booking. The bail amount is decided upon the suspect's first hearing.

  • Why Family Court is a Kangaroo Court With Predictable But Unconstitutional Outcomes (Shane Flait)
    The Family Court is a kangaroo court because of its predictable and unconstitutional outcome - an outcome that deprives a father of his children, and most all his fundamental rights. It's maintained so by the power, money, and agenda of the state-based divorce and domestic violence industry. And here are the perverted and unconstitutional characteristics that allow this to be so.

  • Finding The Right Person For the Job: CPA Vs. Tax Attorney (Mark Etinger)
    Learn when to use a CPA and when you need a tax attorney.

  • How To Find A Qualified Traffic Accidents Lawyer (Reil Miller)
    There are more than 10 million traffic accidents that occur every year across the whole country. A considerable percentage of all the traffic accidents result to injury both minor and serious. It is very disconcerting that some of these injuries can lead to considerable changes in the victim's life.

We Automatically Distribute Articles
To Thousands Of Publishers And Web Sites:

Submit Article
All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and we do not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information. The views expressed are those of the individual contributing authors and not necessarily those of this web site, or its owner, Takanomi Limited.
 
Copyright © 2012 Takanomi Ltd. Company no. 5629683. All rights reserved. | Privacy | Legal | Contact Information