Article Directory :: Legal Articles

The Miranda Rights

By Joe Devine

Subscribe to Joe Devine's RSS feed using any feed reader!

Republish: EasyPublish
Published: 15Jan2008
Word count: 449
Viewed: 307 time(s)
Bookmark this article using any bookmark manager!
Get Free Content For Your Site

Whenever a cop arrests a guy on a cop show, the cop must recite a series of rights to the arrested. The script "you have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can or will be held against you in a court of law . . . "comes directly from the 1966 Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona.

Miranda v. Arizona

In the Miranda decision, the Supreme Court held that anyone arrested had to be told of their rights. The police or any law enforcement officers could not use statements made by the supposed criminal unless certain procedures had been followed. These procedures involve both having a person's rights read to them at the time of an arrest as well as during interrogations. The court specifically outlined the necessary aspects of police warnings to suspects, including the right to have counsel present during interrogations as well as the warning of the right to remain silent.

Other cases were decided at the same time. They all revolved around the idea that unless a suspect was informed of his or her rights, any statement made was not admissible in the trial because the suspect might not have said some things if a lawyer had been there to say "don't answer that."

This was a huge court case in that it defined the rights of the accused and also recognized that police interrogations were more psychologically than physically damaging.

The Miranda Rights

Following the Miranda case, the police were required to inform a person they arrested that they had various rights. These rights include:

- The right to remain silent

- The right to speak to an attorney (or the right to counsel) and have an attorney present during interrogations

If these rights are not read to a person or are violated at any point during the process, the charges can be dropped. Also, certain evidence (such as a confession) may be thrown out if the suspect did not have counsel present or was not informed of the option of legal counsel.

These rights are considered to be a part of the Bill of Rights. These rights stem from amendments 4 through 6 as well as the 14th. They provide for a fair and speedy trial, legal counsel, protection from double jeopardy, protection from self incrimination (I plead the 5th), and various other important features.

If a person is not read the Miranda rights, a skilled criminal defense attorney can have a lot of evidence thrown out. For this reason, it is important that a criminal lawyer be retained for a suspect's defense. They can not only help a person that has been indicted but can help a suspect even before a case goes to trial.

Joe Devine For more information, contact the Denton Criminal Lawyers of Alexander & Associates. http://www.criminallawyerdenton.com

Bookmark this article using any bookmark manager! Subscribe to Joe Devine's RSS feed using any feed reader!

EasyPublish™ this article - publishers click here

More articles by Joe Devine

Free Report!
Ten Essential Secrets Of Article Marketing ... Grab Your Free
Copy
Now:




We respect your privacy.


Need Content?
Regular Top Quality Content for your Blog, Ezine or Website ...
Delivered Direct,
For Free!

Click For Details



Arts & Entertainment
Automotive
Business - General
Computers & Technology
Finance & Investment
Food & Drink
Health & Fitness
Home & Family
Internet Marketing/Online Business
Legal
Pets & Animals
Politics & Government
Reference & Education
Religion & Faith
Self-Improvement/Motivation
Social
Sports & Recreation
Travel & Leisure
Writing & Speaking

More legal articles:

  • Arkansas Judgment Related Laws (Mark Shapiro)
    This article points out a few judgment-related rules and laws in Arkansas. Arkansas laws are usually listed as being annotated in an official register, abbreviated as ANN. Laws can change over time, so please confirm all laws described in this or any of my articles. When you need to find a judgment recovery attorney in Arkansas, contact a judgment referral expert, or visit the Arkansas Bar website at: www.Arkansasbar.org

  • The Responsibilities Of A Personal Injury Lawyer (Reil Miller)
    A lot of people are already aware that there are circumstances and incidents that can lead to injuries. There are victims of accidents and other unfortunate events who have suffered both minor and serious injuries and have sustained property damages as well. However, some of these victims have no idea that they have certain rights and some are unaware that they can hold the other individual or entity responsible.

  • Continuing Legal Education Increases a Lawyer's Preparedness (Mark Etinger)
    Continuing legal education helps new lawyers prepare themselves.

  • Explain Bail Bonds: How It Works (Reil Miller)
    There are times when a person is arrested for certain criminal charges. Some people are arrested due to relatively minor offenses. However, there are still people who are arrested due to a more serious criminal offense. If a person is arrested for serious crimes, except murder or other violent offenses, he or she will have the right to post bail and be temporarily released from jail.

  • Alaska Judgment Related Laws (Mark Shapiro)
    This article points out a few judgment-related rules and laws in Alaska. Laws, regulations, and local court rules do change, so please confirm all laws described in this or all of my articles. When you need to find a judgment attorney in Alaska, contact a judgment referral expert, or visit the Alaska Bar website at: www.alaskabar.org

  • What Can A Bail Bond Agent Do? (Reil Miller)
    Suspects of minor crimes are usually released after a citation is read to them. The citation includes the date of their court hearing. However, suspects of serious crimes usually land in jail where they are booked. These suspects are then subject to bail after booking. The bail amount is decided upon the suspect's first hearing.

  • Why Family Court is a Kangaroo Court With Predictable But Unconstitutional Outcomes (Shane Flait)
    The Family Court is a kangaroo court because of its predictable and unconstitutional outcome - an outcome that deprives a father of his children, and most all his fundamental rights. It's maintained so by the power, money, and agenda of the state-based divorce and domestic violence industry. And here are the perverted and unconstitutional characteristics that allow this to be so.

  • Finding The Right Person For the Job: CPA Vs. Tax Attorney (Mark Etinger)
    Learn when to use a CPA and when you need a tax attorney.

We Automatically Distribute Articles
To Thousands Of Publishers And Web Sites:

Submit Article
All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and we do not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information. The views expressed are those of the individual contributing authors and not necessarily those of this web site, or its owner, Takanomi Limited.
 
Copyright © 2012 Takanomi Ltd. Company no. 5629683. All rights reserved. | Privacy | Legal | Contact Information