Article Directory :: Politics & Government Articles

Disney / ABC deserve credit-Sept. 11th ABC movie

By Richard Stoyeck

Subscribe to Richard Stoyeck's RSS feed using any feed reader!

Republish: EasyPublish
Published: 20Sep2006
Word count: 1076
Viewed: 406 time(s)
Bookmark this article using any bookmark manager!
Get Free Content For Your Site

It is rare, rare indeed when a major media entity bucks the trend, and does what it believes in. Recently ABC under Disney’s guidance aired the $40 million production, “The Path to 9/11”. This was a five hour-two night portrayal of the events that led to 9/11. Having gone through the history of terrorism over the last 25 years, I believe this portrayal was as accurate as you can get. The screenwriters were not politically motivated in any way. They could have come down on the Clinton Administration much harder than what you saw; Bush was not given a free pass either.

Bill Clinton was no different than the Presidents before him. Every President from Jimmy Carter forward, whether Republican or Democrat was soft on terrorism. The Presidents chose to use the notion that terrorism is an illegal act, and should be treated as such, in the courtroom. This meant countless indictments by grand juries of overseas terrorists that would never be brought to trial in America. It was a MARVELOUS political choice of not having to deal with a problem.

The “Path to 9/11” could have humiliated Clinton on this score. They took it easy on the man. I do not criticize Clinton for his actions. He was simply extending the policies of his predecessors into the present. The problem was that terrorism came home to roost big time under the Clinton Administration. The entire plot to take those planes into those buildings was hatched, and prepared while Clinton was President.

The FBI was asleep at the switch, and the CIA wasn’t talking to the FBI. Ask the FBI how they spent a $150 million on a computer system that didn’t work? Ask them if they are computerized as of right now, or are they still using paper index cards in most of their offices? Ask them if more than half their agents have laptop computers today, five years after 9/11? I know the answers to those questions, and you would be surprised at them.

The FBI and the CIA have a long history of dislike for one another. If you want proof, go back to World War II when J. Edger Hoover ran the FBI, and Will Bill Donovan ran the Office of Strategic Services, the predecessor to the current CIA. The two men hated one another, and their respective organizations followed through on the anger. Within days after WW II ended, Hoover forced the new President Harry Truman to disband the OSS as unnecessary. At the same time the Russians were consolidating their gains in Eastern Europe.

The CIA formed just a few years after the was over, was created in spite of Hoover’s strenuous objections. The notion of judicial process of terrorists was continued right on up through our current President, George Bush. This President turned the tables after 9/11. Would you believe that the FBI was still fighting for judicial processing of terrorists after 9/11 while the CIA was fighting for “let us deal with it”? The President sided with the CIA, and the military, against the protests of the FBI, and Justice Department.

Just a few short months earlier, Bush would have probably made the same call as Clinton. Our current President is the first President in my lifetime to deal with terrorism for what it is. It’s an ACT of WAR against this country. For those who want to treat it as something else, let me remind you of the stakes. We lost 2,749 people in the World Trade Centers, and many, many more in the Pentagon and a small field in Pennsylvania. One small nuclear weapon that can fit into a brief case would make New York City uninhabitable for decades at a minimum, probably kill of 250,000 within seconds, with another 300,000 to 500,000 casualties with hospitals that couldn’t help them.

If you don’t think that Osama Bin Laden on a daily basis is not trying to acquire that weapon, than you need to change what you are smoking. These people if they could snap their fingers and remove 300 million Americans from the planet would snap those fingers. Usually people that hate us don’t have the capacity to follow through on their hatred. If you live in a village in the middle of a mountain pass, and you hate Americans, what can you really do, while you sleep in a bug infested hut, eating scrapings from the Chieftain’s table?

Osama on the other hand, has cash estimated at $500 million. Additionally, he raises BIG MONEY on a yearly basis from Arabs who hate us also, and governments seeking to buy protection from him. Do you think it’s just luck that the Saudi Arabian pipelines have not been touched in a terrorist act? Those pipelines are wide open, and just waiting to be blown up. Such an act would put us all on gas lines in the United States, and probably rationing. Aren’t you surprised that Kuwait has not been attacked, or any other oil producing juggernaut.

Oil comes from all the bad neighborhoods of the world, and it is the lifeline of American productivity. We must do whatever we must do to protect that lifeline. If you are concerned about war with extreme Islamic fundamentalists, let me remind you that we once fought a foe just as militant, and just as extreme.

There were once 50 million Nazis that hated our souls, and if gave the chance would have killed every one of us. We fought a war for five years against them. How many Nazis do you see around the world today? They are a group so small that they can be counted on the fingers of a mutilated left hand. If we can successfully eliminate the Nazis, we can successfully eliminate Islamic terrorists from our world as well.

The answer is not hauling them into court and putting them on trial. The answer is to keep them overseas. We must do whatever has to be done to keep this marvelous, wonderful bastion of democracy free from those who would destroy our entire society. We have been God’s gift to the world for 200 years. Yes, we have made mistakes through the decades, but can any other country in two centuries have acted in as wise, and decent a fashion as us ALL THINGS CONSIDERED. I think not.

Richard Stoyeck’s background includes being a limited partner at Bear Stearns, Senior VP at Lehman Brothers, Kuhn Loeb, Arthur Andersen, and KPMG. Educated at Pace University, NYU, and Harvard University, today he runs Rockefeller Capital Partners and StocksAtBottom.com http://www.stocksatbottom.com

Bookmark this article using any bookmark manager! Subscribe to Richard Stoyeck's RSS feed using any feed reader!

EasyPublish™ this article - publishers click here

More articles by Richard Stoyeck

Free Report!
Ten Essential Secrets Of Article Marketing ... Grab Your Free
Copy
Now:




We respect your privacy.


Need Content?
Regular Top Quality Content for your Blog, Ezine or Website ...
Delivered Direct,
For Free!

Click For Details



Arts & Entertainment
Automotive
Business - General
Computers & Technology
Finance & Investment
Food & Drink
Health & Fitness
Home & Family
Internet Marketing/Online Business
Legal
Pets & Animals
Politics & Government
Reference & Education
Religion & Faith
Self-Improvement/Motivation
Social
Sports & Recreation
Travel & Leisure
Writing & Speaking

More political articles:

  • Vote To Change Course (Scott F Paradis)
    In America we like to believe freedom is a universal value. Yet with freedom comes responsibility - these are two sides of the same coin. Though we claim we want freedom, we enthusiastically shift responsibility away from individuals and cast into the realm of public goods - public goods we can readily ignore. It is time to change course.

  • Social Services - Do Changes Need to be Made? (Wendy Moyer)
    Our social structure is being challenged by the need to care for an increasingly large number of people, both young and old, who - for one reason or another - have found that they are unable to take care of themselves and their families. Social service agencies have attempted to ameliorate these problems. But the problems just seem to be getting worse.

  • Public Planning - An Awareness Program Dedicated To Eradicate Violence Against Women (Adele Pitt)
    Public Planning is an organization initiated to support women's rights. The organization is an International United Nations (UN) led public campaign which is designed specially to make public the plight faced by millions of women who are denied their basic human rights.

  • Using Military Online Dating To Find Someone Special (David Planck)
    Military online dating is a fantastic way of meeting singles who want to date a member of the armed forces. Dating someone in the military is a lot different than having a normal relationship with someone who isn't in the military because the lifestyle is completely different.

  • Americans Increasingly Favor Gay Marriage (Mark Etinger)
    America's now favor gay marriage by a slim majority.

  • New Primary Process is Hurting Republicans (Mark Etinger)
    What will become of the Republicans this election cycle?

  • America's Budget-Busting Foreign Policy Disconnect (Aaron Taylor)
    A recent Gallup poll shows that 81% of Americans want the President to be focused on domestic issues, while 9% say they want him to focus on foreign policy issues. Not too surprising….Until you consider that the fastest growing domestic priority is the deficit

  • How Water Main Leak Detection Saves a City Money (Clayton Dorais)
    When a water main leak occurs, the whole water system can be thrown into chaos, especially if the leak isn't quickly detected and dealt with. Water main leak detection is a vitally important service to keep the water main system running smoothly and to save the city money.

  • How Vapor Intrusion Has Slowly Become A Priority In The United States (Wendy Moyer)
    The first vapor intrusion studies of regulated environmental cleanup sites were performed in 1989. Nearly a decade had passed before the first guidance to assist vapor intrusion investigation was issued by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

  • How To Solve The Homeless Situation (Wendy Moyer)
    When you consider that The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has recently found that almost five million low income American households pay more than half of their income in rent it is reasonable to assume that there will be more homeless people this year than there were last year. Where will these "new" homeless go?

We Automatically Distribute Articles
To Thousands Of Publishers And Web Sites:

Submit Article
All content is viewed and used by you at your own risk and we do not warrant the accuracy or reliability of any of the information. The views expressed are those of the individual contributing authors and not necessarily those of this web site, or its owner, Takanomi Limited.
 
Copyright © 2012 Takanomi Ltd. Company no. 5629683. All rights reserved. | Privacy | Legal | Contact Information